These days many families move to other countries for work. Some people believe that children in these families benefit from this move. However, others believe that it makes life more difficult for the children.

These days many families move to other countries for work. Some people believe that children in these families benefit from this move. However, others believe that it makes life more difficult for the children.

Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

Sample answer 1

It has become increasingly common that people move from one country to another in order to find work. When they do this, they often take their children with them. This has major advantages and disadvantages for them, which this essay will explore. It will argue that it is perhaps slightly more beneficial that children have this experience in their lives.

Moving to another country is a major decision to make because it involves serious upheaval, particularly when you have children. There are countless possible stresses and shocks that are involved in this process, not the least of which has to learn a new language. For children, this means moving not just to a new country but to a whole new education system, and while it surely offers opportunities, it is also a frightening experience. These kids can quickly become socially ostracized due to not speaking the local language perfectly or even just through racism or xenophobia.

However, it should not be forgotten that there are various benefits to moving abroad and that even though it may be difficult at first, it might be worthwhile in the long run. Children are resilient and adaptable, so they should cope with the shock of the move. After a few months or years, they will have learned a new language, made new friends, adapted to a new culture, and learned new things. As adults, they will probably look back on this as a period of positive change that made them into stronger and more talented people. Although it was difficult at the time, they will no doubt recognize in the future that it was a necessary hardship to endure.

In conclusion, there are two sides to this debate and each of them has strong points to make, but ultimately it would probably be for the best that a family moves to a new country with their children because there is so much potential for personal growth.

Sample answer 2

More immigrants from underdeveloped countries are migrating to industrialized countries in search of a better living environment for their children. Some people believe that their decisions will improve their children's development and growth, while others fear that changing living conditions will have negative consequences for their children. The essay will analyze both points of view and provide my conclusion that children will benefit from early transfer to a new nation.

To begin with, migrating from a poor to a developed country will provide youngsters with a more welcoming and serene living environment. Furthermore, in new countries, children will benefit from peaceful communities, greater educational resources, a clean living environment with little pollution, and universal health care assessors. Chinese immigrants in Canada, for example, make it safer for their Chinese to prosper in Canadian communities. At the very least, their children are growing up in a society where they are not at risk of becoming infected with corona viruses. Their youngsters are much happier at school since they are not subjected to the same intense study demands as those in China.

Some people, on the other hand, believe that relocating to a new country will have a detrimental impact on young arrivals. They will face cultural shock, a language barrier, a foreign climate, and other challenges. All of this will provide difficulties for these young newcomers. For example, upon arrival in Canada, all young newcomers must take an English assessment exam before being placed in ESL lessons. Due to linguistic problems at new schools, all of these newcomers may suffer. They may experience psychological problems as a result of their inability to make new acquaintances in their new schools or towns. Furthermore, kids may not receive enough assistance from their parents, who are also dealing with comparable issues.

Emigration to industrialized nations, in my opinion, will benefit young arrivals if they can concentrate on overcoming cultural shocks by learning the language and being open-minded to adopt a new culture. Furthermore, newcomers should seek aid from local communities in order to adapt to the societies and be eager to learn about the various cultures.

Finally, because of the aforementioned factors, relocating to a new developed country will be difficult. The advantages of relocation, on the other hand, will favor young newcomers who are prepared to put in the effort to adjust to their new surroundings. As a result, parents should begin educating their children before to their transfer in order to avoid the aforementioned disadvantages.

IELTS Writing Task 2 Real Exam Test came on 20th August 2022

IELTS Writing Task 2 with Solved Answer 7 Bands+

                   


Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods. Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging.

Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Sample answer 1

 

Modern society faces a serious problem with pollution, and in the industrialized world, people have been looking for answers for many years. One of the most heated arguments right now is on who should be primarily responsible for this improvement: businesses or individuals. This essay will examine both claims and come to the conclusion that the blame should be shared.

First off, some claim that because large businesses have benefitted for years from heinous crimes against the environment, they are to blame for resolving our environmental issues. Consumers might carry on with their regular shopping without having such a significant negative impact on the environment if these businesses abruptly switched to sustainable, eco-friendly goods and packaging. By eliminating the individual's freedom of choice, this would guarantee that everyone makes a contribution to restoring our world. However, since businesses rely on revenues and single-use plastics are typically inexpensive, many of them are hesitant to adapt.

On the other side, individuals may also influence events. Businesses only sell what there is a demand for, therefore if consumers start demanding greener products and more ethical business practises, businesses will be forced to comply. If consumers began to criticise or reject excessively packaged items, businesses would act swiftly to appease the consumer. Unfortunately, not everyone is concerned about the environment, and in many places of the world, cost takes first. We won't advance if we only rely on people to make this decision. People should not be relied upon to make sensible decisions because in many areas of the world, people still believe that it is OK to toss plastic into rivers.

To sum up, both businesses and people should play a part in repairing the harm they have caused to the planet, but neither can be fully trusted. Governments should enact legislation with harsh penalties for offenders who breach environmental standards in addition to everyone making some kind of good effort.

Sample answer 2

Global plastic trash has significantly increased during the past ten years. But poor waste management is really the major problem. Many individuals think that in order to fix this issue, producers should use less packing for each product, while others think that consumers must stop favouring products with bulky packaging. This article will address both perspectives.

The usage of plastics has increased over time, and due to their affordability, nearly every factory today employs one or more forms of plastic for packaging. As a result, millions of plastic covers are discarded in our oceans and on our land, endangering the lives of numerous animals, birds, and marine life. On the other side, a large number of non-governmental organisations and human rights advocates are pushing for strict rules that would make it illegal to consume polythenes in workplaces and grocery stores. For instance, the Tamilnadu government has banned the sale of plastic covers at all retail establishments as part of an environmental effort.

On the other hand, some contend that customers' opposition to multi-packaged items is the only way to completely remove the usage of plastic. For instance, many influencers and YouTubers promote using cloth bags when shopping, and this small gesture has assisted several people in changing their routines of purposefully avoiding polythene bags. Additionally, these people forecast that manufacturers would stop using plastics in favour of substitutes that will please all customers.

There is no denying that the development of this lightweight packaging has had a negative rather than positive influence on many lives. Therefore, the government needs to pass stringent regulations outlawing their usage in warehouses and retail establishments. At the same time, customers should use environmentally friendly natural packaging after doing their research.